Camp Cho-Yeh · Leadership Intelligence
Donor impact viewTwo summers of parent feedback, re-analyzed from the raw data.
1,146 responses in 2026 and 1,443 in 2025, kept separate and compared year over year. 2025 and 2026. Every number here was recomputed from the underlying response rows and chart geometry of the source reports — not copied from the summary pages — and validated against the one question the reports publish numerically (agreement within 0.2 points).
9.36
2026 mean experience rating (1–10)
2025: 9.24 · +0.11 · n=1,097
84%
Rate the summer 9 or 10
2025: 80% · detractors (1–6) fell to 2.3%
98%
Would recommend Cho-Yeh
Of parents expressing an opinion, 2026
17,533
Retreat guests served
88 groups · 111 staff, 2025-26
Read this first
Six findings that don't jump off the summary pages
The activity bottleneck eased — on a half-sized base
Answered by 52% of 2026 respondents
Counselors are now the strongest operational asset
Faith outcomes softened slightly while faith demand held
Bullying response is the real improvement target
Camp changes kids; it isn't yet changing homes
Core experience
Where agreement moved, 2025 → 2026
Biggest improvements
- My child thought the food was great+8.2
73% → 81%
- My child enjoyed their counselors+2.2
94% → 96%
- My child had enough to eat+2.1
89% → 91%
- My child was picked on or left out(lower is better)+1.4
8% → 7%
Softest movement
- My child learned more about God and the biblical story-2.1
95% → 93%
- My child was strengthened in faith-1.3
94% → 93%
- It is clear that camp had an impact on my child-1.2
97% → 96%
- My child made new friends at camp-0.6
96% → 96%
Movement is scored in the favorable direction: for the three negatively worded statements (“picked on or left out”, “did not get along”, “did not get to do some activities”) a drop in agreement counts as an improvement, and all three dropped. Nothing in the instrument moved more than about two points against Cho-Yeh.
2026 experience rating distribution
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Median 10. 65% of parents chose a perfect 10, up from 61% in 2025. Strong agreement — not merely satisfaction — is what moved: “blast at camp” strong agreement sits at 87%.
Life change at home
What parents notice after camp
- 57%61%+4.0 pts
My child is showing more concern for the needs of others, putting others' nee…
- 47%51%+3.5 pts
My child has been more social, wanting to spend more time with others than be…
- 68%70%+2.6 pts
My child has more self-confidence
- 54%57%+2.5 pts
My child has engaged me in conversations about God and faith more frequently…
- 60%62%+2.3 pts
My child has been nicer or more pleasant to other family members…
- 37%40%+2.2 pts
I have noticed significant changes in my child
- 37%38%+1.6 pts
My child has been spending less time on electronic devices (computer, phone, …
- 62%62%flat
My child has been singing Christian songs
- —52%new in 2026
My child has been more helpful around the house
13 2026 statements were shown to only about half of respondents
These items across the 2026 instrument were answered by roughly 52% of respondents — a consistent subgroup, not random skipping, which points to a mid-season questionnaire change. They are reported here on their own base and should not be compared head-to-head with 2025 without that caveat.
- My child has shown greater interest in attending church47%
base: 52% of respondents · 2025 (full base): 49%
- My child has asked to lead the family in prayers during meal times more frequ…22%
base: 52% of respondents · new in 2026
- My child reads their Bible more frequently38%
base: 52% of respondents · 2025 (full base): 35%
- My child is more adventurous, willing to step outside their comfort zone and …67%
base: 52% of respondents · 2025 (full base): 62%
- My child has shown greater interest in spending time outdoors or interacting …51%
base: 52% of respondents · 2025 (full base): 49%
- My child has expressed a new or greater interest in serving others in our com…43%
base: 52% of respondents · new in 2026
Operations
Program excellence: what exceeds, what needs work
Exceeds expectations (2026)
- Communication and preparation with families prior to the camp week…72% (-4.2)
- Offering age-appropriate activities and programshalf base70% (+0.8)
- Opening day check-in process66% (-2.7)
- Closing day check-out process64% (-5.0)
- Photo and Email system58% (-11.2)
- Effectively teaching the Christian faith57% (-8.7)
- Maintenance and upkeep of current facilities and grounds56% (-6.8)
- Communication with parents/caregivers during the week of camp…52% (0.0)
- Equipping you, as a parent/caregiver, to continue the positive impacts of cam…half base43% (-2.7)
- System of addressing bullying and other relational conflicts…half base36% (-3.4)
- Quality of food available for the campers29% (-3.6)
Needs improvement (2026)
- Quality of food available for the campers9% (-9.8)
- System of addressing bullying and other relational conflicts…half base8% (-5.6)
- Photo and Email system6% (-0.5)
- Communication with parents/caregivers during the week of camp…4% (0.0)
- Equipping you, as a parent/caregiver, to continue the positive impacts of cam…half base3% (-3.4)
- Maintenance and upkeep of current facilities and grounds2% (-1.9)
- Opening day check-in process2% (-5.2)
- Closing day check-out process2% (-2.7)
- Communication and preparation with families prior to the camp week…1% (-0.8)
- Effectively teaching the Christian faith0% (-0.4)
- Offering age-appropriate activities and programshalf base0% (-1.8)
Bars scaled ×4 for legibility. Dissatisfaction fell in every area year over year.
The pattern to notice: enthusiasm compressed toward “satisfied”
Dissatisfaction fell in every operational area, yet “exceeds expectations” also fell in 9 of 11 areas — most sharply for the photo and email system (-11.2 pts) and teaching the Christian faith (-8.7 pts). Parents moved from delighted to content, not from content to unhappy. Overall ratings rose because the core experience — counselors, friends, fun — improved, while the surrounding systems became merely adequate. That is the quiet risk in an otherwise strong year.
4%
Highest “worse than previous years”: Camper check-in and drop off on first day of camp
Down from 7% in 2025
50%
Say the overall experience was better than previous years
Among returning families who could compare
33%
2026 families attending for the first time
Why roughly a third of comparison answers are “unsure”
In their own words
What families value, and what they raise
What we value about Cho-Yeh
- Faith / God49%
- Independence / growth28%
- Fun / activities22%
- Friendship / community18%
- Counselors / role models12%
- Unplugging / outdoors11%
- Safety / trust10%
- Tradition / legacy2%
Themes inside written concerns
- Communication28% (-0.4)
- Food26% (-1.7)
- Cabin / bunkmates19% (-3.0)
- Counselors18% (-3.9)
- Activities16% (-2.0)
- Check-in / out11% (-2.8)
- Heat & water6% (+2.3)
- Bullying / conflict6% (+0.4)
- Medical / health4% (-4.3)
- Cost / value1% (-0.9)
- Homesickness0% (-1.4)
Written concerns fell from 542 to 355 responses (38% → 31% of parents), with homesickness and cost mentions nearly disappearing.
One word to describe camp: “fun” dominates both years, but faith and character words (adventurous, impactful, fulfilling) sit right behind it — parents describe formation, not just recreation.
Cho-Yeh as a whole
Retreat and group ministry reach
17,533
Retreat guests
Combined sites
88
Groups hosted
Avg 199 guests per group
111
Staff serving retreats
Roughly 1 staff per 158 guests
- 4,5372642
Boxwoods
- 12,9966269
Carolina Creek
Carolina Creek carries 74% of retreat guests and 70% of groups, at a similar guest-to-staff ratio to Boxwoods — the year-round side of the ministry serves several times more people than the summer program that the survey measures, and currently generates no comparable feedback data.
Alignment
What families want camp to do
- 98%99%flat
To have fun
- 96%95%-0.9 pts
Make friends and develop social skills
- 88%87%-1.0 pts
Grow in faith and learn more about God
- 98%99%flat
Strengthen character traits like integrity and self-confidence…
- 95%95%flat
Have new experiences or try new things
- 80%80%flat
Develop an appreciation for nature and the outdoors
- 77%77%-0.8 pts
Equip/influence families to continue the positive impacts of camp in the home…half base
Fun is the entry ticket, character is the expectation
Church-connected, but not church-saturated
Method and confidence
How these numbers were produced
Response-level data (experience ratings, one-word descriptions, and all open-ended answers) was read directly from the source exports: 2,540 numeric ratings and roughly 27,000 comment rows. The published 2025 mean of 9.24 reproduces exactly from the raw rows.
Quantitative results that exist only as chart images were recovered by measuring bar geometry against detected axis gridlines, then calibrated against the single question the reports publish as a numeric table. Recovered values match that table within 0.2 percentage points, and every 100%-stacked row reconstructs to 100% ±0.5.
All rates on this page are recomputed on an explicit base: “unsure” is excluded from opinion measures rather than counted as disagreement, and partial-coverage items are reported on their own base.
Data quality flags for leadership
- Mid-season instrument change. 13 2026 items were answered by only ~52% of respondents. Fix the questionnaire before the 2027 season so every statement carries a full base.
- Response volume fell. 1,146 responses in 2026 versus 1,443 in 2025 (-21%). Scores improved, but a smaller sample skews toward more engaged families.
- Awareness gaps, not dissatisfaction. Bullying response draws 47% “unsure” answers and faith-in-the-home items draw the next most. Where parents cannot observe a process, silence is being recorded as neutrality.
- Retreats are unmeasured. The year-round side of the ministry serves 17,533 guests with no equivalent feedback instrument.